Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2005 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2005 (8) TMI 603 - AT - Customs

Issues:
Appeal against Order-in-Appeal, Mis-declaration of imported goods, Confiscation under Customs Act, 1962, Enhancement of goods value, License requirement for imported goods, Justification of penalties and fines.

Analysis:

The appeal was made against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Bangalore, regarding the import of 'Red Coral Stones' claimed to be for decorative purposes. The Customs authorities suspected the stones were for medicinal use, requiring a license. The Original authority alleged mis-declaration, increased the goods' value, and imposed a redemption fine and a penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the order, emphasizing the need for a license for actual users of the stones for medicinal purposes.

During the hearing, the appellant argued the stones were solely for decorative purposes and obtained the license only due to Customs Department's insistence. They highlighted previous similar imports without a license from the same supplier. The Tribunal agreed with the lower authorities on mis-declaration and the stones falling under crude drugs requiring a license. However, they found arbitrariness in enhancing the goods' value and reduced the fine and penalty imposed.

The Tribunal observed that the transaction value can only be rejected under specific conditions per Customs Valuation Rules. As proper procedures were not followed in rejecting the transaction value and due to arbitrariness in the lower authorities' orders, they set aside the enhancement of goods value. The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine and penalty amount, concluding the appeal in favor of the appellant with revised penalties.

In conclusion, the Tribunal acknowledged the license requirement for certain imported goods, upheld mis-declaration allegations, but found fault in the arbitrary enhancement of goods value. The Tribunal's decision resulted in the reduction of fines and penalties imposed on the appellant, providing a balanced resolution to the issues raised in the appeal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates