9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of income.
Facts of the case: During investigation, it was found that the assessee had shown gifts from NRIs as bogus, later declared as undisclosed income. The assessee declared income as long-term capital gain but did not disclose additional income from bogus gifts. Assessing Officer treated the undisclosed sum as income and taxed it at 30%. Penalty proceedings were initiated u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of income. Assessee's arguments: Assessee argued that penalty was invalid as Assessing Officer did not record concealment satisfaction in assessment order. Also, Explanation 1 to section 271(1)(c) was not applicable as no addition was made to income. Assessee challenged the penalty on grounds of different grounds for initiation and imposition, and inapplicability of Explanation 4. CIT(A) decision: CIT(A) held that penalty was leviable under the main provision of section 271(1)(c) for concealing income, not under Explanations. Rejected argument on Explanation 4 and upheld penalty based on main provision. Confirmed Assessing Officer's order. Tribunal's decision: Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s decision, stating that penalty was rightly imposed under the main provision of section 271(1)(c) for concealing income. Dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Conclusion: Tribunal found no infirmity in CIT(A)'s order confirming the penalty for concealment of income u/s 271(1)(c). Upheld the penalty and dismissed the appeal of the assessee.
|
