Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2008 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2008 (5) TMI 578 - AT - Customs

Issues:
1. Refund of duty on short-shipped consignment for export.
2. Applicability of provisions of unjust enrichment to refund claims.

Issue 1: Refund of duty on short-shipped consignment for export
The dispute in this case revolves around the refund of duty on short-shipped consignments for export. The appellant contended that since the goods were not exported, there was no occasion to pass on the burden of cess to the buyer. Citing a precedent, the appellant argued that short-shipped consignments fall outside the purview of unjust enrichment. The Commissioner (Appeals) noted that the refund claims pertained to export shipments where the burden of the cess claimed could not have been transferred to the buyer due to non-exportation or short-shipping of goods. Consequently, the Commissioner (Appeals) held that the refund amount, already sanctioned, was due to the appellant-exporter and should be granted accordingly.

Issue 2: Applicability of provisions of unjust enrichment to refund claims
The Revenue, in their appeal, reiterated their stance that the provisions of unjust enrichment are applicable to all types of refund claims. However, the Tribunal disagreed, emphasizing that when goods have not been exported, the duty paid by the assessee should be treated as a deposit, with no second party involved to raise concerns of unjust enrichment. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' view, rejecting the Revenue's appeal on the grounds that there was no infirmity in the decision regarding the applicability of unjust enrichment in cases where goods were not exported.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the refund of duty on short-shipped consignments for export and the non-applicability of unjust enrichment provisions in such cases. The judgment highlights the importance of considering specific circumstances, such as non-exportation of goods, in determining the entitlement to duty refunds and the absence of unjust enrichment concerns in certain scenarios.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates