2008 (8) TMI 726 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues:
1. Confirmation of demand of duty and penalty imposed on the appellant.
2. Financial hardship claimed by the appellant.
3. Reflection of clandestinely removed duty free procured raw material in the balance sheet.
4. Requirement of pre-deposit to safeguard the interest of Revenue.

Analysis:

1. The judgment deals with the confirmation of demand of duty and penalty imposed on the appellant, M/s. Micro Polyester Pvt. Ltd., for illegally diverting duty-free procured raw material in the local market by showing the consumption of the same in the production of exported goods. The Commissioner, Central Excise, Surat confirmed a demand of Rs. 1,77,72,753/- along with a personal penalty of Rs. 40 lakhs. Penalties of varying amounts were also imposed on other appellants. The Tribunal noted that the appellant did not advance any arguments on merits but sought dispensation with the condition of pre-deposit due to financial hardship.

2. The appellant claimed financial hardship, stating that they have been declared a sick unit by the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction. The Chartered Accountant's certificate indicated that the company had carried forward losses of around Rs. 83 lakhs, and the net worth of the company was negative. However, the Tribunal raised concerns about the sale proceeds of the clandestinely removed duty-free procured raw material not being reflected in the balance sheet, which could impact the financial health of the company. In cases of clandestine activities, the Tribunal held that the financial health reflected in the balance sheet might not be a correct representation.

3. The issue of reflection of clandestinely removed duty-free procured raw material in the balance sheet was crucial in determining the financial status of the appellant. The Tribunal highlighted that when goods procured duty-free for export were diverted to the local market, the cash consideration received might not be reflected in the balance sheets. This discrepancy raised doubts about the accuracy of the financial health portrayed in the balance sheet, especially in cases of clandestine activities.

4. To safeguard the interest of Revenue and in the absence of submissions on the merits of the case, the Tribunal directed M/s. Micro Polyester Pvt. Ltd. to deposit 25% of the duty involved and 10% of the penalty imposed within eight weeks. Upon such deposit, the pre-deposit of the balance amount of duty and penalty was waived, and the recovery of penalties imposed on other appellants was stayed. Non-compliance with the deposit directive would lead to the automatic dismissal of all appeals without further notice. The matter was scheduled to come up for compliance verification on 8-10-2008.