Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2009 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (2) TMI 639 - AT - Customs

Issues:
Penalty imposed for importing Non Alcoholic Bavaria Malt Beverage without special import license.

Analysis:
The case involved a penalty of Rs. 1,25,000/- imposed on the appellants for importing Non Alcoholic Bavaria Malt Beverage without a special import license. The Revenue contended that the goods fell under ITC (HS) 220290.00.10, requiring a special import license. However, the appellants argued that the goods should be classified under the residual entry of 2202.90.00, which did not require any license. The Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai addressed a letter to the DGFT stating that the appellants' claim of classification seemed to have merit, and an appropriate amendment may be made in the EXIM ITC (HS) for better clarification.

The Commissioner's letter highlighted that the imported goods did not contain added sugar or sweetening matter, suggesting they could fall under the residual entry of 2202.90.00. The Commissioner agreed that the appellants' arguments for classification were not baseless and recommended an amendment to align the classification with the Customs Tariff. Subsequently, the DGFT clarified that the goods were classifiable under the entry as claimed by the Department.

Considering the confusion and lack of clarity in the classification of the imported goods, the Tribunal held that the appellants could not be deemed guilty of a mala fide decision. The Tribunal acknowledged that the Commissioner himself agreed with the appellants' classification, indicating the ambiguity in the entries. Therefore, the Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellants to Rs. 13,000 for non-production of a special import license. The appeal was disposed of based on these findings.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates