Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2001 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2001 (7) TMI 34 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
Interpretation of provisions of section 37(3A)/(3B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding expenditure on repairs of motor cars.

Analysis:
The case involved a dispute regarding the treatment of expenditure on repairs of motor cars by an assessee-company deriving income from manufacturing and sale of printing ink and synthetic resins. The Income-tax Officer disallowed a portion of the claimed amount under sections 37(3A) and (3B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld this decision. However, in the appeal before the Tribunal, the assessee relied on judgments of the Bombay High Court and a decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal to argue that expenses related to repair of motor cars fall under section 31 and are not covered by section 37(3A) of the Act.

The Tribunal, following the Bombay High Court's view, held that expenses for repair of motor cars are covered by section 31 and are not within the scope of section 37(1) read with section 37(3A) of the Act. The Revenue contended that in a previous assessment year, it was held that reimbursement of motor car expenses under section 37(3A)/(3B) applies to expenses incurred by employees using their own motor cars for business purposes. The assessee's counsel argued that "repairs" and "maintenance" are distinct, with repair expenses being allowable under section 31, thus not necessitating deduction under section 37(1) and, consequently, not attracting the provisions of section 37(3A)/(3B).

The Court referred to its previous decisions in cases like CIT v. Orient Paper and Industries Ltd. and National Engineering Industries Ltd., where it was held that repair expenses on motor cars fall under section 31 and are not subject to section 37(3A)/(3B). The Court distinguished between "running and maintenance" expenses and repair expenses, affirming that the latter are covered by section 31. Consequently, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision and ruled in favor of the assessee against the Revenue, disposing of the reference accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates