Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2001 (6) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Plus+
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2001 (6) TMI 17 - HC - Income Tax

Issues Involved: Interpretation of sections 194C, 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding deduction of tax at source and levy of interest on default.

Summary:
The High Court of Gujarat addressed a case where a co-operative society failed to deduct tax under section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, from payments to a contractor, Ravi Builder. The contractor had paid advance tax and self-assessment tax on the income received. The Assessing Officer levied interest under section 201(1A) on the society for not deducting tax at source. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner partially allowed the appeal based on the contractor's tax payments. The Tribunal upheld this decision, leading to the reference question on whether the contractor's tax payments should offset the society's liability.

The Revenue argued that the society's failure to deduct tax constituted a default, justifying interest under section 201(1A). They cited a previous judgment to support their position. In contrast, the society contended that as the contractor had paid the due tax, no loss occurred to the Revenue. They emphasized that the law as interpreted by the Tribunal was just and proper.

The Court analyzed the Act's provisions on tax imposition and deduction at source, emphasizing the society's obligation to pay tax on behalf of the contractor under section 194C. They noted that the contractor had indeed paid the tax due, eliminating the society's liability. The Court highlighted that if the tax was paid on time, the Revenue should not levy interest under section 201(1A), especially when the contractor had paid more than required. They concluded that the Tribunal's decision to deduct the contractor's tax payments from the society's liability was correct to prevent undue benefit to the Revenue.

In conclusion, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the contractor's tax payments should offset the society's liability under section 194C, and interest under section 201(1A) was not justified. The reference was answered accordingly, with no costs incurred.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates