9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Interpretation of section 143(1A) of the Income Tax Act 2. Applicability of deductions under section 80P 3. Effect of retrospective amendment on tax liability Interpretation of section 143(1A) of the Income Tax Act: The case involved a reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the confirmation of an order deleting additional income-tax of Rs. 22,42,320 under section 143(1A) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1990-91. The assessee had declared a loss, but the Assessing Officer calculated additional tax based on certain adjustments made. The Tribunal, relying on a judgment of the Delhi High Court, held that the assessee was entitled to deductions and that additional income-tax could not be imposed. However, the Supreme Court, considering the retrospective amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 1993, clarified that even if the loss declared by an assessee had been reduced due to adjustments under section 143(1)(a), the provisions of section 143(1A) would apply. The Court emphasized the retrospective nature of the amendment, leading to a decision in favor of the Revenue. Applicability of deductions under section 80P: The assessee had claimed a deduction under section 80P on account of profits from members. The Assessing Officer made adjustments, resulting in a net income for tax calculation. The Tribunal's decision in favor of the assessee was based on the belief that the deductions claimed were legitimate. However, the Supreme Court's observation in a related case highlighted the importance of considering the retrospective amendment to section 143(1A) in determining the tax liability, ultimately leading to a decision in favor of the Revenue. Effect of retrospective amendment on tax liability: The judgment emphasized the impact of the retrospective amendment to section 143(1A) introduced by the Finance Act, 1993. The Supreme Court's interpretation clarified that the amended provisions applied even when an assessee's declared loss had been reduced due to adjustments made under section 143(1)(a). This retrospective nature of the amendment was crucial in deciding the case in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The Court's decision in light of the larger Bench overruling the judgment on which the Tribunal had relied further solidified the position that the additional income-tax was indeed leviable. Consequently, the Tribunal's order was set aside, and the reference was decided in favor of the Revenue, marking the conclusion of the case with no costs awarded.
|
