9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of the first proviso to section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1987-88. Analysis: The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal referred a question of law regarding the retrospective operation of the first proviso to section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The question was whether the Tribunal was legally justified in directing to restrict the disallowance under section 43B, related to sales tax collections, to an amount not paid in the succeeding year within the time allowed under the proviso. The Tribunal's decision was based on the view that the first proviso was clarificatory and retrospective in nature, inserted by the Finance Act, 1987, with effect from April 1, 1988. The Tribunal's direction was to ascertain sales tax realizations, payments made, and whether the balance amount was paid within the statutory time allowed under the proviso, thereby deleting the disallowance made under section 43B to that extent. The Tribunal emphasized that Explanation 2 to section 43B did not control the first proviso but was subject to it. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) had enhanced the assessed income by the amount of unpaid sales tax liability disallowed in the previous assessment year, which was allowed by the first appellate authority. The Appellate Tribunal, following precedents and considering the retrospective nature of the first proviso, directed the Assessing Officer to make necessary calculations and delete the disallowance based on the proviso's requirements. The Tribunal's decision was influenced by the Patna High Court's judgment and other judicial decisions, supporting the retrospective operation of the first proviso. In the absence of any conflicting judgments and considering the decision of the apex court in Allied Motors P.Ltd. v. CIT [1997] 224 ITR 677, the High Court answered the question in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Court affirmed the Tribunal's interpretation of the first proviso to section 43B as retrospective and clarificatory in nature, leading to the deletion of the disallowance based on the statutory requirements outlined in the proviso. The Court's decision was made without any order as to costs, aligning with the legal precedent and the interpretation of the Income-tax Act provisions.
|
