2006 (11) TMI 160 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues involved:
The judgment involves the disallowance of deduction u/s 80HHC for the transfer of exhibition rights of a film outside India during the assessment year 1993-94. The main issue is whether the deduction under section 80HHC in relation to the export of a film print for exhibition outside India is valid in law.

Judgment Details:

1. Disallowance of Deduction u/s 80HHC:
The Revenue disallowed the assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80HHC for the transfer of exhibition rights of a film print outside India during the relevant assessment year. The Assessing Officer held that it did not amount to the export of goods or merchandise. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed the appeal, which was further upheld by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in favor of the assessee.

2. Interpretation of Section 80HHC by Bombay High Court:
The Bombay High Court in Abdulgafar A. Nadiadwala v. Asst. CIT [2004] 267 ITR 488, interpreted the scope of section 80HHC concerning the transfer of telecasting rights of films to a foreign enterprise. The High Court considered whether the product involved could be classified as 'goods' or 'merchandise,' whether it was exported out of India involving clearance at the customs station, and if the consideration received could be termed as sale proceeds constituting part of export turnover.

3. Bombay High Court's Findings:
- The High Court held that the transaction involving the purchase of rights and transfer of telecasting rights for a film print could be described as goods or merchandise falling within the ambit of section 80HHC.
- It was determined that the transaction indeed involved the export of goods out of India, constituting a sale that cleared customs station, as per the provisions of section 80HHC.
- The consideration received in the transaction was considered as export proceeds, synonymous with sale proceeds, making the assessee eligible for deduction u/s 80HHC.

4. Application of Legal Principles by Madras High Court:
Applying the legal principles established by the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in Tata Consultancy Services v. State of Andhra Pradesh [2004] 271 ITR 401, the Madras High Court held that exporting the right of exhibition of a film print qualifies as the sale of goods or merchandise. Consequently, the assessee satisfied the conditions under section 80HHC, entitling them to the deduction.

5. Final Decision:
Based on the settled legal precedents and interpretations, the Madras High Court ruled in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, dismissing the tax case appeal and allowing the deduction u/s 80HHC. No costs were awarded in this matter.