9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The judgment involves appeals filed by the Revenue against the orders of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal related to the non-inclusion of income on non-performing assets in the profit and loss account for the year 1994-95 by the assessee. Facts and Decision: The assessee, engaged in hire purchase transactions and leasing of plant and machinery, filed their income tax return in 1994. The Assessing Officer noted that the income on non-performing assets was not accounted for in the profit and loss account for the relevant year. The assessee claimed to have written it off or offered it as income in subsequent years. The Assessing Officer rejected this claim, stating that income must be accounted for in the year it accrued. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld this decision, leading to an appeal to the Tribunal. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order and directed a fresh assessment based on previous decisions. Legal Precedents: The issue in these appeals is addressed by the Supreme Court judgments in UCO Bank v. CIT and Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd. v. CIT. The Supreme Court emphasized the treatment of interest on 'sticky' loans and the accounting methods followed by the assessee. The circulars issued were meant to ensure that interest on doubtful loans is not included in income until actually received, aligning with the provisions of section 145. The circulars provided a uniform test for assessing authorities to determine the nature of interest income on such loans. Judgment: Citing the Supreme Court's findings in UCO Bank v. CIT, the High Court dismissed the appeals, as the issue was covered by the legal precedents discussed. The Court held that the circulars and accounting practices followed by the assessee justified the non-inclusion of income on non-performing assets until actually received. The appeals were thus dismissed with no costs incurred.
|
