9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The judgment involves the interpretation of whether income from unsold flats should be assessed as business income or income from house property under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Issue 1 - Assessment of Income from Unsold Flats: The assessee received rental income from unsold flats, which was initially taxed as income from house property by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal, in the original order, upheld this treatment despite the assessee's claim that it should be considered as business income. The Tribunal referenced a judgment of the Karnataka High Court to support its decision that income derived from property should be assessed as income from property, not business income. The Tribunal, upon a miscellaneous application, reversed its original view and treated the rental income as income from business. The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in reversing its decision based on the same material, stating that once a possible view has been taken, it cannot be changed on a miscellaneous application. Issue 2 - Legality of Tribunal's Order: The High Court considered whether the Tribunal's order under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was sustainable in law. The Court found that the Tribunal's reversal of its original decision regarding the assessment of income from unsold flats was erroneous. It concluded that there was no apparent mistake that warranted correction under section 254(2) and that the Tribunal's original view was not incorrect. Therefore, the High Court answered question No. 2 in the negative, in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. Conclusion: The High Court's judgment upheld the original assessment of income from unsold flats as income from house property, emphasizing that a Tribunal's decision should not be reversed on a miscellaneous application if a possible view has already been taken. The Court's ruling favored the Revenue in this case, and the reference was disposed of accordingly.
|
