2001 (8) TMI 106 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Justification of the Tribunal's order allowing deduction u/s 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Relevance of the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Dr. B. Venkata Rao [2000] 243 ITR 81.
3. Classification of the assessee as an industrial undertaking for deductions u/s 80HH and 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Summary:

Issue 1: Justification of the Tribunal's order allowing deduction u/s 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961

The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order allowing the respondent's deduction u/s 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal relied on precedents from the Kerala High Court (CIT v. Upasana Hospital [1997] 225 ITR 845), Rajasthan High Court (CIT v. Trinity Hospital [1997] 225 ITR 178), and the Supreme Court (CIT v. Dr. B. Venkata Rao [2000] 243 ITR 81). However, the High Court found that these cases were decided under section 32A and not sections 80HH and 80-I, making them irrelevant for determining whether a hospital qualifies as an industrial undertaking for these deductions.

Issue 2: Relevance of the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Dr. B. Venkata Rao [2000] 243 ITR 81

The Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Dr. B. Venkata Rao [2000] 243 ITR 81 pertained to section 32 of the Act, determining that a building used as a nursing home qualified as a plant for depreciation purposes. The High Court noted that this decision did not address whether a hospital is an industrial undertaking under sections 80HH and 80-I, thus rendering it inapplicable for the current case.

Issue 3: Classification of the assessee as an industrial undertaking for deductions u/s 80HH and 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961

The High Court emphasized that sections 80HH and 80-I apply to industrial undertakings involved in manufacturing or producing articles. The Tribunal did not provide clear findings that the hospital manufactured or produced any articles. The High Court referred to several judicial interpretations of "manufacture" and concluded that without evidence of manufacturing activities, the hospital could not be classified as an industrial undertaking eligible for deductions u/s 80HH and 80-I.

Conclusion:

The High Court answered all substantial questions of law in favor of the Department and against the respondent-assessee. The orders of the Appellate Tribunal and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) were set aside regarding the reliefs under sections 80HH and 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appeal was allowed.