2000 (9) TMI 52 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Chargeability of interest u/s 234A, 234B, and 234C.
2. Chargeability of interest u/s 139(8) and 217.
3. Binding effect of the Supreme Court's dismissal of the civil appeal.

Summary:

Issue 1: Chargeability of Interest u/s 234A, 234B, and 234C

The Division Bench initially held that interest under sections 234A and 234B should not be charged on excess tax as per income determined under sections 143(3) and 144 of the Act. Instead, interest u/s 234A was leviable on the tax on the total income as declared in the return. This decision was affirmed by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 10360 of 1996 (CIT v. Ranchi Club Ltd. [2001] 247 ITR 209), which found no merit in the Revenue's appeal.

Issue 2: Chargeability of Interest u/s 139(8) and 217

The Division Bench faced conflicting views regarding the necessity of a specific order for charging interest. The assessee relied on Uday Mistanna Bhandar and Complex v. CIT [1996] 222 ITR 44 (Patna), arguing that without a specific order in the assessment, interest could not be demanded. Conversely, the Revenue cited CIT v. Quality [1997] 224 ITR 77 (Patna), asserting that the statute mandates interest without the need for an adjudication by the assessing authority. The Full Bench was tasked with resolving whether interest could be charged and recovered in the absence of a specific order.

Issue 3: Binding Effect of the Supreme Court's Dismissal of the Civil Appeal

The Full Bench examined whether the Supreme Court's dismissal of the civil appeal in Ranchi Club Ltd.'s case [1996] 217 ITR 72 (Patna) was binding. The Supreme Court's dismissal of the appeal after hearing the parties was held to be a binding precedent u/s 141 of the Constitution, meaning the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within India. The Full Bench concluded that the Division Bench's decision in Ranchi Club Ltd.'s case, affirmed by the Supreme Court, correctly decided the issues.

Conclusion:

1. The Division Bench's decision in Ranchi Club Ltd.'s case [1996] 217 ITR 72 (Patna), affirmed by the Supreme Court, correctly addressed the issues.
2. Interest u/s 234A and 234B is leviable on the tax on the total income as declared in the return, not on the assessed income.
3. In the absence of a specific order from the assessing authority, interest cannot be charged and recovered from the assessee.

The records were sent back to the Division Bench for the disposal of the writ petitions accordingly.