Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2009 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (9) TMI 744 - AT - Service Tax

Issues involved: Application for waiver of service tax, denial of abatement on value of materials, suppression of facts, pre-deposit of tax amount.

Waiver of Service Tax:
The judgment pertains to an application for waiver of service tax of Rs. 1,66,227/- along with interest and penalty under Section 78 of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. The demand was confirmed against the assessees providing maintenance and repair services, with the denial of abatement on the value of materials sold during the service, as per Notification No. 12/03-ST dated 20-6-03. The benefit of abatement was refused on the basis that materials like ironbents, screws, plates, etc., were used for repair work and not sold. The applicants' admission of non-payment of sales tax did not negate the occurrence of a sale of materials. The Tribunal found no prima facie case in the applicants' submissions, hence rejecting their plea at this stage.

Suppression of Facts:
Although the show cause notice alleged suppression of facts, which was upheld by the lower authorities, the applicants did not contest this charge before the adjudicating authority or the lower appellate authority. Despite the allegation of suppression, the applicants failed to raise any plea against it. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the applicants to pre-deposit the tax amount within eight weeks from the date of the judgment. Upon such deposit, the pre-deposit of penalty would be waived, and the recovery stayed pending the appeal. Failure to comply with this direction would lead to the dismissal of the appeal, with a compliance report due on 7-12-2009.

Conclusion:
The judgment underscores the importance of compliance with tax regulations and the necessity of addressing allegations promptly during legal proceedings to avoid adverse consequences.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates