9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
Interpretation of taxability of income derived during the formation period for the main business against project cost. Analysis: The case involved a question of law regarding the taxability of income derived by the assessee during the formation period for the main business. The company, a Government of India undertaking, had not started its business operations as it was still under construction during the assessment years in question. The assessing authority included income from interest and house property in the assessment under section 143(3) for the relevant years. The assessee contended that the receipts did not constitute income as they were related to the fixed structure being set up before the business commenced. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) agreed with the assessee, relying on relevant case laws. However, the Revenue appealed to the Tribunal, which dismissed the appeal based on precedents like Challapalli Sugars Ltd.'s case. The Tribunal held that the income should be nil for the years under consideration. The matter was then referred to the High Court for opinion. The Revenue contended that the taxability of income should be determined based on statutory provisions, not equity or accountancy practices, citing the Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. case. The Supreme Court in that case clarified that interest earned during the formative period is taxable income, regardless of its use. The assessee relied on various judgments to support their position, arguing that the Tribunal's decision was justifiable based on existing authorities. The High Court noted that when the apex court corrects an earlier interpretation of the law, actions based on the erroneous view are also deemed incorrect. Therefore, the High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the income derived during the formation period was taxable, contrary to the assessee's claim. In conclusion, the High Court's judgment clarified the taxability of income derived during the formation period for the main business. The decision emphasized that income earned during the formative stage is taxable as per statutory provisions, regardless of its utilization. The ruling highlighted the importance of legal precedents and the impact of apex court decisions on interpreting the law correctly. The judgment ultimately favored the Revenue, affirming the taxability of the income in question against the project cost for the oil refinery and petrochemicals, the main business for which the company was set up.
|
