1971 (3) TMI 111 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:

1. Whether cinder is classified as coal or a form of coke under entry 1 of Schedule II of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959.
2. The applicability of the dictionary meaning versus the popular meaning in tax statutes.
3. The relevance of prior judicial decisions and interpretations in determining the classification of cinder.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification of Cinder:

The primary issue was whether cinder could be classified as coal or a form of coke under entry 1 of Schedule II of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court reviewed the decision in *Varadarajulu Naidu v. State of Madras* which held that cinder is not included within the meaning of "coal, including coke in all its forms." The court also referenced the decision in *Mahabir Singh Ram Babu v. Assistant Sales Tax Officer* which supported this position. The court noted that cinder, unlike coal, is obtained after coal has been burnt and thus does not retain the same characteristics as coal. The court concluded that cinder does not fall under the entry for coal or coke in the Act.

2. Dictionary Meaning vs. Popular Meaning:

The court emphasized the importance of interpreting terms in tax statutes according to their popular meaning rather than their strict dictionary definitions. It cited the Supreme Court decision in *Ramavatar Budhaiprasad v. Assistant Sales Tax Officer* which held that terms in tax statutes should be understood in their common parlance. The court observed that while dictionaries may describe cinder as a residue of coal, the popular understanding and trade usage do not equate cinder with coal or coke. The court reiterated that cinder, being a product of burnt coal, does not retain the essential characteristics of coal.

3. Judicial Precedents and Interpretations:

The court reviewed several judicial precedents to support its decision. It referred to the Allahabad High Court's decision in *Mahabir Singh Ram Babu v. Assistant Sales Tax Officer* which distinguished cinder from coal based on its post-combustion state. The court also considered the Andhra Pradesh High Court's decision in *Chitta Reddi v. State of Andhra Pradesh* which held that cinders are not coal in the popular sense. Additionally, the court noted the Supreme Court's decision in *Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Jaswant Singh Charan Singh* which emphasized the popular meaning of terms in sales tax statutes.

The court also discussed the legislative history and the intention behind the classification of goods under the Essential Goods (Declaration and Regulation of Tax on Sale or Purchase) Act, 1952, and the Central Sales Tax Act. It concluded that cinders were not considered goods of special importance and thus did not qualify as declared goods under entry 1 of Schedule II of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959.

Conclusion:

The court held that cinders do not fall under entry 1 of Schedule II of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and thus are not classified as coal or a form of coke. The writ appeals and tax cases were dismissed with costs, affirming the lower court's decision and the interpretations provided by prior judicial decisions.