9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of interest paid on bank overdraft. Summary: Disallowance of Interest Paid on Bank Overdraft: The assessee appealed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) dated August 31, 2009, for the assessment year 2006-07, which confirmed the disallowance of interest paid on bank overdraft. The assessee had claimed a deduction of Rs. 14,92,657 on interest paid to Canara Bank on an overdraft limit taken for dealing in the sale and purchase of shares. The Assessing Officer issued a show-cause notice referencing the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Dr. V. P. Gopinathan [2001] 248 ITR 449 (SC), which disallowed such deductions. Despite a detailed reply from the assessee, the Assessing Officer disallowed the claim, and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld this decision. The learned Departmental representative noted that a similar issue arose in the case of the assessee's husband, where the Tribunal upheld the disallowance in principle but remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer to verify if borrowed funds were used for investments generating short-term capital gains. The Tribunal's order in I.T.A. No. 4194/Del/2009 was cited. The Tribunal considered the facts and contentions, noting that the assessee had shown short-term capital gain and claimed interest expenditure against it. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify if the borrowed funds were used for investments generating short-term capital gains and to allow interest attributable to such borrowed funds out of the income offered under 'Short-term capital gain'. Following the Tribunal's order in the case of the assessee's husband, the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to examine the issue in accordance with the Tribunal's directions. In conclusion, the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced in the open court on May 6, 2010.
|
