9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Denial of deduction under section 80RR
Analysis: The appeal was filed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-I, Mumbai, regarding the denial of deduction under section 80RR of the Income-tax Act in respect of income of Rs. 2,67,150. The assessee, a music director, received this income in convertible foreign exchange as an advance for music shows to be performed abroad. However, due to the cancellation of the shows by the organizers, the income was forfeited. The Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) held that since the assessee did not perform the shows abroad, the deduction under section 80RR was not admissible. The counsel for the assessee argued that the income was derived during the normal course of the assessee's profession, and all conditions under section 80RR were fulfilled. The Departmental Representative contended that the income, although incidental to the profession, cannot be considered as derived from the profession. The key contention revolved around the interpretation of the phrase "any income derived in the exercise of his profession" under section 80RR. The Tribunal analyzed the provisions of law and the facts of the case. It noted that the income from music shows performed abroad by the assessee was eligible for deduction under section 80RR. The Tribunal emphasized that the language used in section 80RR should be liberally interpreted. It held that since the income was derived during the exercise of the assessee's profession, even though the shows were canceled due to circumstances beyond the assessee's control, the character of the income did not substantially change. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under section 80RR for the forfeited income of Rs. 2,67,150. As a result, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction under section 80RR for the impugned sum of Rs. 2,67,150.
|
