9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Interpretation of the retroactive effect of a proviso to section 113 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in a block assessment case.
In the case, the Revenue challenged an order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal related to a block assessment period from April 1, 1989, to July 27, 1999, where surcharge was levied post rectification of the block assessment order u/s 154 of the Act due to the incorporation of a proviso to section 113 of the Act. The main contention was whether the proviso had a retroactive effect from June 1, 2002, or not. Block Assessment and Surcharge Issue: The Revenue rectified the block assessment order to levy surcharge based on the proviso to section 113 of the Act inserted by the Finance Act, 1999, effective from June 1, 2002. The Tribunal correctly held that the proviso did not have retroactive effect, and surcharge could not be levied for the period prior to June 1, 2002. The interpretation that the proviso would operate from the date of the search in 1999 was deemed incorrect and an attempt to give retrospective effect, which was not intended by Parliament. Debatable Nature and Rectification Issue: The Commissioner (Appeals) considered the matter debatable, indicating that surcharge could not have been levied through a rectification order u/s 154 of the Act. The Tribunal concurred, emphasizing that the proviso to section 113 did not apply retroactively and could not be enforced through rectification proceedings. The Tribunal's decision was upheld as no substantial question of law was found to arise from the case. This judgment clarifies the non-retroactive nature of the proviso to section 113 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and establishes that surcharge cannot be imposed for a period before the proviso's effective date, even in block assessment cases.
|
