9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The judgment addresses the question of law regarding the allowance of expenditure under section 57(iii) against the assessee's income under the head 'Other sources' for the assessment years 1978-79, 1979-80, and 1980-81. Assessment Year 1978-79: The assessee, a private limited company in liquidation, filed returns admitting nil income due to excess expenditure over income. The Income-tax Officer disallowed certain expenses against interest receipt on fixed deposits, stating they were not incurred in earning interest income. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the expenditure under section 57(iii) as it was connected to the earning of interest income. The Appellate Tribunal upheld this decision, finding the expenses deductible against income assessable under 'Other sources'. Assessment Years 1979-80 and 1980-81: Similar to the previous year, the Tribunal allowed the entire expenditure against income under 'Other sources', which was challenged by the Revenue. The Tribunal's decision was based on the connection between the expenditure incurred by the official liquidator and the interest income earned, as per section 57(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Legal Arguments: The Revenue contended that the expenses were not related to earning interest income, citing a Supreme Court decision. The assessee's counsel argued that the expenditure was necessary for earning interest income, referencing a previous court decision that supported the deductibility of such expenses. Court's Analysis: The court examined the nature of the expenditure, finding it essential for protecting and preserving assets, thereby enabling the earning of interest income. Distinguishing the Supreme Court decision cited by the Revenue, the court emphasized the nexus between the expenditure and the interest income earned by the official liquidator. Decision and Conclusion: The court held that the expenses incurred were directly related to maintaining the infrastructure for earning interest income. Relying on factual findings by the Tribunal, the court affirmed that the expenditure was deductible under section 57(iii) of the Act. Consequently, the questions of law in all tax cases were answered in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.
|
