Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 1982 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1982 (11) TMI 158 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Issues involved: Interpretation of sub-rule (7) of rule 12 regarding filing of C forms before assessing authorities and appellate authorities.

Summary:
The judgment discussed the interpretation of sub-rule (7) of rule 12 in relation to the filing of C forms before assessing authorities and appellate authorities. The case involved a dealer who did not file C forms before the first assessing authority, resulting in a higher tax rate being levied. The appellate authorities refused to accept the forms, leading to a challenge by the dealer. The contention was whether the appellate authority had the power to receive the forms if the dealer showed sufficient cause for the delay.

The court analyzed the provisions of sub-rule (7) of rule 12 and relevant regulations. It was observed that the appellate authority, having powers similar to the original authority, could receive additional evidence, including C forms, if satisfied with the reasons provided by the dealer for the delay. The court emphasized that the appellate authority could either decide on the sufficient cause itself or remit the matter to the assessing authority for further inquiry.

The judgment highlighted the powers vested in the appellate authority under section 19(4) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act and regulation 11 of the Andhra Pradesh Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal Regulations, allowing for inquiries and acceptance of additional evidence in appeals. The court reasoned that insisting on filing C forms only before the assessing authority could lead to unnecessary delays and multiple proceedings, contrary to the objectives of the Act and Rules.

In conclusion, the court held that the appellate authority had the power to receive the C forms if submitted before it, providing flexibility to avoid procedural formalities and expedite the resolution of tax matters. The matter was remitted to the first appellate authority for further consideration in accordance with the court's observations and the law.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates