9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1987 (7) TMI 540 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax
Issues:
Validity of the order of remand passed by the Board of Revenue under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958. Analysis: The case involved a dispute regarding the assessment of tax on a dealer dealing in motor parts and fuel ejection pumps. The assessing authority raised the gross turnover of the assessee based on transactions not recorded in account books but found in papers seized from a former employee. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner granted partial relief to the assessee, which became final as the department did not appeal. However, the Board of Revenue remanded the case to the assessing authority for fresh assessment, leading to a reference to the High Court. The counsel for the assessee argued that the Board had no legal basis to remand the case as the relief granted by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had become final. It was contended that since there was no evidence linking the undisclosed transactions to the assessee, a fresh assessment was unwarranted. The Government Advocate, on the other hand, asserted the assessee's liability to pay tax under the Act, justifying the remand for reassessment. The High Court considered the power of the Board to remand a case and noted that in this instance, where both the assessing authority and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner found no evidence implicating the assessee in the undisclosed transactions, further inquiry was unjustified. Citing a precedent from the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the High Court held that remanding the case for additional information against the petitioner was not warranted. Consequently, the High Court answered the referred question in the affirmative, favoring the assessee. The reference was thus answered in favor of the assessee, with each party bearing its own costs. This judgment clarifies the circumstances under which a remand by the Board of Revenue is justified and emphasizes the importance of evidence in tax assessments to avoid unnecessary inquiries that could prejudice the taxpayer.
|
