Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 1991 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1991 (11) TMI 225 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Issues Involved:
The judgment involves assessment of sales tax under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, determination of escaped turnover, calculation of penalty under section 16(1)(i), interpretation of the definition of "sale price" under section 2(p) of the Act, and consideration of separate pricing for warranty charges.

Assessment of Sales Tax and Penalty:
The assessing authority found that the full sale price was not shown in the return, leading to tax evasion. Despite opportunity, the books of account and debit notes were not produced, resulting in the calculation of escaped turnover on an estimated basis. The tax was levied on the determined turnover, and penalty under section 16(1)(i) was imposed. The Deputy Commissioner upheld the tax levy but set aside the penalties. In the second appeal, the Sales Tax Tribunal set aside the tax levy and rejected the appeal regarding penalties.

Interpretation of "Sale Price" and Warranty Charges:
The Government Advocate argued that warranty charges collected by the assessee should be part of the sale price as per section 2(p) of the Act. It was contended that warranty charges were collected uniformly from all customers, forming a consolidated sale price. However, the assessee's counsel argued that warranty charges, being optional and for future acts, should not be included in the sale price. The judge agreed that if warranty charges were voluntary and separately charged, they should not be considered part of the sale price. The matter was remanded to examine if separate pricing existed for goods with and without warranty.

Penalty Imposition and Conclusion:
The judge opined that no penalty should be levied when entries exist in the books of account, and the issue pertains to the interpretation of "sale price." Accordingly, the penalty was set aside. The revision was partly allowed, with no order as to costs, and the petition was partly allowed.

This judgment addresses the assessment of sales tax, calculation of penalty, interpretation of the sale price definition, and the treatment of warranty charges under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, providing clarity on the inclusion of such charges in the sale price based on voluntary nature and separate pricing considerations.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates