Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 2008 (12) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2008 (12) TMI 678 - SC - Indian Laws


Issues involved:
Validity of marriage between a Hindu and a Christian under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Validity of marriage between a Hindu and a Christian under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

The case revolved around the validity of a marriage between a Roman Catholic Christian appellant and a Hindu respondent, solemnized under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The respondent filed a petition for nullity of the marriage based on misrepresentation by the appellant regarding his religion. The High Court declared the marriage void ab initio, leading to the appeal. The appellant argued that the Act does not prevent a Hindu from marrying a person of another faith. Mr. Lalit, assisting the Court, highlighted Section 5 of the Act, emphasizing the word 'may' as not making conditions mandatory for the marriage. He contended that the marriage was not void under Section 11 but could be voidable. The appellant's counsel argued that the Act allows marriage between individuals, not limited to Hindus. However, the respondent's counsel stressed the Act's application to Hindus only, as per the Preamble and Section 2. The Court held that the Act was specifically for Hindus, and marriage conditions in Section 5 were mandatory. The marriage, performed under Hindu customs, was declared a nullity, with the High Court's decision upheld.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's decision that the marriage between a Hindu and a Christian under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, was a nullity. The subsequent marriage of the respondent was deemed irrelevant in light of the nullity of the initial marriage. The Court appreciated Mr. Lalit's assistance in reaching the decision, and no costs were awarded in the case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates