Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 1999 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1999 (1) TMI 504 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Issues:
1. Inclusion of trade discount for the purpose of levy of turnover tax under section 6-B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.
2. Inclusion of stock transfer in the total turnover for the purpose of liability of tax under section 6-B.

Analysis:
1. The judgment addresses the contention regarding the inclusion of trade discount for turnover tax. It references a previous decision by the court in the case of Belgaum Structural Engineering Pvt. Limited, establishing a precedent on turnover tax on trade discounts.

2. The issue of including stock transfers in the total turnover for tax liability under section 6-B is extensively discussed. The judgment analyzes the definitions of turnover, sale, and purchase price under relevant sections of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. It emphasizes that stock transfers by the assessee to agents or branches are not explicitly included in the total turnover or turnover, as defined by the Act.

3. The judgment delves into the concept of turnover tax liability, emphasizing the distinction between sale turnover and purchase turnover. It clarifies that in cases of stock transfers where there is no sale, purchase of goods may still be subject to purchase tax, but not turnover tax.

4. Section 6-B of the Act is examined to determine the conditions for levy of turnover tax. It stipulates that every registered dealer with a turnover not less than Rs. 5 lakhs is liable to pay turnover tax, irrespective of whether the turnover is taxable under other provisions. The judgment interprets the definitions of "total turnover" and "turnover" under the Act to elucidate the scope of turnover tax liability.

5. A comparison is drawn with a previous case, S.N. Guggari and Company v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, to address the issue of deductions for total turnover computation. The judgment concludes that since the raw materials used for manufacturing goods do not constitute turnover and there is no sale involved in goods transferred to branches, turnover tax under section 6-B cannot be imposed.

6. As a result of the analysis, the assessing authority is directed to recompute the turnover tax liability based on the observations provided in the judgment, ultimately disposing of the petition with the outlined conclusions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates