Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1999 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1999 (4) TMI 77 - HC - Income Tax

Issues involved:
The High Court of Gujarat was asked to determine whether the Income-tax Officer was entitled to reopen the assessment u/s 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 1967-68 and 1968-69.

Summary:

The Tribunal affirmed the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) regarding the reopening of assessments for the two years. The Assessing Officer reopened the assessments based on information from a court judgment. However, it was found that the reopening fell under section 147(b) due to the nature of the information and not under section 147(a). As per section 149, the limitation for initiating proceedings under section 147(b) is four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, which had expired in this case. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the assessee on the merits. The Tribunal concluded that the initiation of reassessment proceedings under section 147(b) was time-barred.

The Tribunal highlighted the statutory requirements for cases falling under section 147(a) and 147(b). It was emphasized that for section 147(a) to apply, the Income-tax Officer must have reason to believe that income has escaped assessment due to the assessee's failure to disclose all material facts. In this case, the belief was based on information from a court judgment, not the assessee's failure to disclose facts. Therefore, the initiation of reassessment proceedings was deemed time-barred.

It was noted that the Supreme Court had reversed the decision of the Gujarat High Court in a related case, which supported the Tribunal's decision on the merits. The Court considered the question of the validity of reassessment to be academic in light of this development.

In conclusion, the High Court answered the questions in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, with no order as to costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates