1998 (10) TMI 59 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Whether the order passed by the Income-tax Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was barred by the period of limitation?
2. Whether the Income-tax Officer had the jurisdiction to levy the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act?

Analysis:

Issue 1:
The case involved a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the imposition of a penalty by the Income-tax Officer. The assessee challenged the penalty order on the grounds that it was beyond the period of limitation prescribed under the Act. The Income-tax Officer initially levied the penalty on August 31, 1980, but this order was set aside by the Commissioner of Income-tax under section 263 of the Income-tax Act on September 1, 1981. The Income-tax Officer then passed a fresh penalty order on December 14, 1981. The Tribunal held that the objection of limitation raised by the assessee was overruled in an earlier appeal and that the period of limitation applies only to the initial penalty order, not to subsequent orders made in compliance with higher authorities' directions. The Tribunal affirmed that the Income-tax Officer had the jurisdiction to pass the penalty order.

Issue 2:
The second issue revolved around whether the Income-tax Officer had the jurisdiction to levy the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee contended that the order dated December 14, 1981, was without jurisdiction as the matter of imposing penalty was initially referred to the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner. However, due to a change in the law vesting the power to impose penalties with the Income-tax Officer from April 1, 1976, the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner did not assume jurisdiction. The Tribunal upheld the Income-tax Officer's jurisdiction, emphasizing that the subsequent penalty order was based on the directions of the Commissioner of Income-tax under section 263, which had been confirmed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found no merit in the arguments challenging the jurisdiction of the Income-tax Officer and concluded that the order was passed in compliance with the higher authorities' directions, making the objections regarding jurisdiction baseless.

In summary, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee on both issues of limitation and jurisdiction concerning the penalty order passed by the Income-tax Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act.