9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to exemption u/s 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. 2. Classification of sweetmeats and biscuits as retaining original properties of flours, water, or sugar. Summary: Issue 1: Entitlement to Exemption u/s 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 The primary issue was whether the assessee's business of preparing and selling sweetmeats and biscuits qualifies as an "industrial undertaking" under section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, thereby entitling the assessee to an exemption from wealth-tax. The Tribunal had held that the assessee was engaged in the "manufacture or processing of goods" and thus qualified for the exemption. However, the High Court referred to various precedents to interpret the term "manufacture or processing of goods." The court examined several cases, including: - CIT v. Casino (Pvt.) Ltd.: Held that a hotel business does not qualify as an "industrial company" as the preparation of food does not constitute "manufacture or processing of goods." - CIT v. Buhari Sons Pvt. Ltd.: Concluded that the preparation of eatables in a hotel is a trading activity, not a manufacturing one. - CIT v. Berry's Hotels Pvt. Ltd.: Affirmed that the activity of cooking food in a hotel is a trading activity, not qualifying for the concessional tax rate for industrial companies. - S. P. Jaiswal Estates Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT: Contrarily, held that the preparation of food in a hotel involves processing and thus qualifies as an industrial activity. The court ultimately followed the precedent set by Buhari Sons Pvt. Ltd., binding on it, and held that the assessee's activity of preparing sweetmeats and biscuits is a trading activity. Therefore, it does not qualify as an "industrial undertaking" under the Wealth-tax Act, and the assessee is not entitled to the exemption u/s 5(1)(xxxii). Issue 2: Classification of Sweetmeats and Biscuits Given the findings on the first issue, the second issue regarding whether sweetmeats and biscuits retain the original properties of flours, water, or sugar did not arise for consideration and was thus not addressed. Conclusion: The High Court concluded that the assessee's business does not qualify for the exemption u/s 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, as it is a trading activity and not an industrial undertaking. The tax case (reference) was disposed of with no costs.
|
