Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1998 (3) TMI HC This
Issues Involved:
1. Whether tax deductible at source should be deducted before calculating interest. 2. Whether interest u/s 215 should be levied without giving credit for tax deducted at source. 3. Whether interest u/s 215 should be charged after giving credit for tax deducted at source, even if deducted and paid in the next year. 4. Whether it is the tax deductible at source or the tax actually deducted at source that should be considered while computing interest u/s 215. 5. Whether credit has to be given for tax deducted at source for the purpose of charging interest u/s 215. 6. Whether assessed tax should be reduced by the amount of tax deductible u/s 192 to 195 and not the tax actually deducted at source. 7. Whether the Assessing Officer should work out the amount of tax deductible at source on interest income and give due credit for the same for the purpose of working out the assessed tax u/s 215(5). 8. Whether charging of interest u/s 215 is to be computed after giving credit for tax deducted at source. 9. Whether interest u/s 215 should be levied after giving credit for tax deducted at source which was not actually deducted during the year but deducted and paid in the next year. Summary: 1. Tax Deductible at Source Before Calculating Interest: The court addressed whether the Appellate Tribunal was correct in holding that tax deductible at source should be deducted before calculating interest. The Tribunal's decision in Kanchanjunga Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO was followed, which held that credit for tax deducted at source should be given when computing interest u/s 215. 2. Credit for Tax Deducted at Source: In multiple references, the court examined whether interest u/s 215 should be levied without giving credit for tax deducted at source. It was held that credit must be given for tax deductible at source before calculating interest. 3. Interest Charged After Giving Credit for Tax Deducted at Source: The court considered whether interest u/s 215 should be charged after giving credit for tax deducted at source, even if deducted and paid in the next year. The Tribunal's decision was upheld, confirming that credit must be given for tax deductible at source when computing interest. 4. Tax Deductible vs. Tax Actually Deducted: The court deliberated whether it is the tax deductible at source or the tax actually deducted at source that should be considered while computing interest u/s 215. It was concluded that the tax deductible at source should be considered. 5. Credit for Tax Deducted at Source for Charging Interest: The court affirmed that credit has to be given for tax deducted at source for the purpose of charging interest u/s 215. 6. Assessed Tax Reduction: The court examined whether assessed tax should be reduced by the amount of tax deductible u/s 192 to 195 and not the tax actually deducted at source. It was held that the assessed tax should be reduced by the amount of tax deductible. 7. Working Out Tax Deductible at Source: The court addressed whether the Assessing Officer should work out the amount of tax deductible at source on interest income and give due credit for the same for the purpose of working out the assessed tax u/s 215(5). It was affirmed that this approach should be followed. 8. Charging Interest After Giving Credit for Tax Deducted at Source: The court confirmed that charging of interest u/s 215 is to be computed after giving credit for tax deducted at source. 9. Interest After Credit for Tax Deducted and Paid in Next Year: The court concluded that interest u/s 215 should be levied after giving credit for tax deducted at source which was not actually deducted during the year but deducted and paid in the next year. Final Decision: The court upheld the Tribunal's view that the tax deductible at source should be reduced from the tax determined on the basis of the regular assessment, and thereafter, the liability to pay interest should be calculated u/s 215. The references were disposed of in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.
|