1996 (1) TMI 17 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Assessability of accrued interest of Rs. 26,538.
2. Allowability of expenses of Rs. 23,850 against interest income.

Summary:

Issue 1: Assessability of Accrued Interest of Rs. 26,538

The first item of dispute relates to whether the sum of Rs. 26,538 was assessable as accrued interest. The Administrator-General of Madras, representing the estate of the late Mrs. Ida L. Chambers, filed a suit against A. Nagappa Chettiar to recover dues, which was settled out of court. The Income-tax Officer assessed the interest on an accrual basis. The Tribunal, however, found that the assessee had to forgo not only the interest but also a part of the capital in the compromise, and thus, the interest could not be collected. The Accountant Member held that the sum of Rs. 26,538 should not have been added as accrued interest, while the Judicial Member held that the interest accrued should be taxed on an accrual basis. The Third Member supported the Accountant Member's view, stating that the Administrator-General must follow the receipt basis of accounting as per the Administrators-General Act, 1913, and thus, the interest of Rs. 26,538 cannot be assessed in the hands of the assessee. The court concluded that the interest income of Rs. 26,538 is not taxable in the assessment year under consideration.

Issue 2: Allowability of Expenses of Rs. 23,850 Against Interest Income

The second part of the question concerns the deduction of Rs. 23,850 as expenses incurred for earning the income. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the expenses, but the Tribunal allowed the deduction, stating that the expenses were incurred for realising the interest income. The Judicial Member suggested that only the portion of the expenditure attributable to the interest income should be allowed. The Third Member held that the expenses incurred for earning the interest income should be allowed on a cash basis. The court agreed with the Tribunal's view that the expenditure of Rs. 23,850 incurred for filing the suit to recover the amount with interest from the debtor is allowable as a deduction u/s 57(iii) of the Act, as it was incurred wholly and exclusively for making or earning the income.

Conclusion:

The court answered the first part of the question in the negative and against the Department, and the second part in the affirmative and against the Department. There were no orders as to costs.