1984 (11) TMI 331 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues:
1. Whether handling charges form part of the value of goods for assessment purposes.

Analysis:
The case involved a dispute regarding the inclusion of "handling charges" in the assessable value of goods for excise duty assessment. The appellants, who were manufacturing aluminum wire rods, charged handling charges in addition to the controlled prices fixed under the Aluminum (Control) Order, 1970. The lower authorities held that these handling charges should be added to the assessable value, leading to a duty liability on the appellants. The Assistant Collector and the Appellate Collector upheld this decision, prompting the appeal before the Tribunal.

The consultant for the appellants argued that during the relevant period, the assessable value of goods was determined based on the controlled prices under the Order, which did not include handling charges. He emphasized that the handling charges were not an element to be included in the assessable value, especially for the period when the controlled price was exclusive of excise duty. The consultant also highlighted that the handling charges were incurred on behalf of the buyers and separately recovered from them, thus not forming part of the assessable value.

On the other hand, the Respondent's representative contended that statutory provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, governed the valuation of goods for excise purposes, and the controlled prices under the Order could not override these provisions. He argued that the handling charges incurred by the appellants for delivering goods to the nearest point of delivery could be included in the assessable value under Section 4(1)(a) of the Act.

The Tribunal observed that the controlled price, inclusive of excise duty but exclusive of transportation charges, could not be the assessable value. It clarified that reimbursement of expenses like handling charges, incurred for and on behalf of the purchaser, did not constitute part of the price of goods. The Tribunal referred to a Supreme Court decision to support the principle that the assessable value should be based on the price at which the goods are sold at the place of removal, deducting the cost of transportation. Therefore, for the period when the controlled price was exclusive of excise duty, the assessable value should not include handling charges.

Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the Collector (Appeals) for re-determination of the assessable value in line with the observations made.