9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The judgment involves a petition filed by the Commissioner of Income-tax under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, seeking a mandamus to direct the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to refer questions of law arising from a specific case for the assessment year 1976-77. Details of the Judgment: The assessee, initially filing a return as a Hindu undivided family, had the return treated as non est by the Income-tax Officer. Subsequently, a notice under section 147/148 was issued in 1985 for escaped income, without specifying the status in which the return was to be filed. Despite various interactions and requests, the status issue remained unresolved. Ultimately, the Income-tax Officer made a best judgment assessment in the status of a Hindu undivided family, which was upheld in appeal. However, the Tribunal later found the initial notice to be vague and ambiguous due to the missing status specification, leading to the current petition. The Revenue contended that the assessee had waived the right to object to the defect in the notice and that any defect was cured by section 292B of the Act. The High Court, after reviewing the Tribunal's order, concluded that the Tribunal erred in not referring the questions claimed by the Revenue. Consequently, the Court consolidated the questions into one, focusing on the validity of the notice under section 148 in light of the assessee's alleged waiver of objection to the defect. The Court directed the Tribunal to refer the consolidated question of law, along with the case details, for the Court's opinion, emphasizing the need for clarity on the validity of the notice under section 148 considering the circumstances and the applicability of section 292B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
|
