Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1961 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1961 (9) TMI 74 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
Validity of gift based on book entries
Transfer of an actionable claim through book entries

Validity of gift based on book entries:
The case involved a dispute regarding the validity of a gift made by the assessee to his grandsons, as reflected in the book entries transferring a sum of money. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal held that the entries in the account books were not sufficient evidence to establish a valid gift. The Tribunal specifically noted that the entries were not made in the regular course of business, casting doubt on their reliability. The Tribunal rejected the contention that a valid gift was made by the assessee to his grandsons based on these entries.

Transfer of an actionable claim through book entries:
Another issue in the case was whether the transfer of the amount from the assessee's account to his grandsons' accounts constituted a transfer of an actionable claim. The Tribunal agreed with the Appellate Assistant Commissioner that the amount owed by the partnership to the assessee was a debt and, therefore, an actionable claim. It was argued that the transfer could have been effected through a tripartite agreement, but the court found no evidence to support this claim. The court held that without a proper deed as required by the Transfer of Property Act, no valid transfer of the amounts had taken place.

Conclusion:
The court answered both questions in the negative, stating that the book entries did not constitute a valid gift and that the transfer of the amount to the grandsons amounted to a transfer of an actionable claim, which required a proper deed for validity. The court rejected the arguments presented by the assessee's counsel and upheld the decisions of the lower authorities. The assessee was directed to pay the costs of the department, and no further orders were issued.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates