9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Interpretation of section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for deduction eligibility based on the number of workers engaged in the manufacturing process. Analysis: The case involved a dispute regarding the eligibility of an assessee firm, a rice miller, for deduction under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessing authority initially disallowed the deduction, citing the failure of the assessee to prove engagement of more than 10 persons in the manufacturing process. However, both the Assistant Appellate Commissioner and the Tribunal allowed the claim for deduction under section 80J. The Tribunal, in its finding, emphasized that the assessee firm qualified as an industrial undertaking and was entitled to the deduction under section 80J. The Tribunal rejected the contention of the Departmental Representative that a previous decision was sub judice due to lack of details and supporting documentation. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the AAC based on the presence of more than 10 workers in the assessee's business, classifying it as an industrial undertaking. In support of its decision, the Tribunal referred to a previous judgment in CIT v. Sultan & Sons Rice Mill, emphasizing that various processes from raw material purchase to finished goods sale constituted the manufacturing process, and workers involved in these processes were considered engaged in manufacturing. Based on this precedent, the Tribunal found no illegality in allowing the deduction under section 80J. Ultimately, the High Court answered the question in the affirmative, ruling against the department and in favor of the assessee. The judgment highlighted the importance of meeting the criteria for an industrial undertaking and the interpretation of the manufacturing process under section 80J for claiming deductions under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
|
