2003 (2) TMI 480 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in directing that the cash seized be adjusted towards the advance tax liability of the assessee as on 30-3-1990.
2. Whether the interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was chargeable.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Adjustment of Cash Seized Towards Advance Tax Liability:

The Revenue challenged the Tribunal's order directing that the cash seized be adjusted towards the advance tax liability of the assessee as on 30-3-1990. The Tribunal had initially directed the Assessing Officer to grant the necessary relief to the assessee, which would result in the deletion of interest charged under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. Upon the assessee's application for rectification, the Tribunal revisited its order, acknowledging a mistake apparent on the record. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had requested the adjustment of the seized cash against the advance tax payable. Consequently, the Tribunal remitted the matter back to the C.I.T. (A) to decide on the merits of the assessee's claim regarding the adjustment of the seized cash towards advance tax liability.

The C.I.T. (A) held that the cash seized on 30-11-1989 could not be adjusted towards advance tax liability since the order under Section 132(5) was passed only on 30-3-1990, after the due dates for advance tax payments had lapsed. The Tribunal, however, concluded that the cash could have been adjusted on 31-3-1990, the day the order under Section 132(5) was passed, and directed the Assessing Officer to recalculate the interest chargeable, if any.

2. Chargeability of Interest Under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C:

The Tribunal's decision was based on the statutory scheme of the Income Tax Act, particularly the provisions related to advance tax and search and seizure. Section 132(5) mandates that the Income Tax Officer, after conducting an inquiry and making a summary assessment, must determine the tax, interest, and penalty payable and retain sufficient assets to satisfy these liabilities. The Tribunal held that the cash seized should be considered adjusted towards the advance tax liability on 30-3-1990, the date of the Section 132(5) order, thereby negating the chargeability of interest from 1-4-1990.

The Revenue's appeal under Section 260A raised a substantial question of law regarding the Tribunal's direction to adjust the seized cash towards the advance tax liability. The High Court examined the statutory provisions, including Sections 207, 208, 211, and 132 of the Income Tax Act. It concluded that the Tribunal's view was consistent with the legislative scheme, which allows the adjustment of seized assets against tax liabilities only after an order under Section 132(5) is made.

Findings:

The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming that the cash seized could be adjusted towards the advance tax liability as of 30-3-1990, and no interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was chargeable from 1-4-1990. The appeal was dismissed, with no order as to costs. The Court emphasized that the statutory scheme of Section 132(5) necessitates that the assets seized be retained until a final order is made, and only then can they be adjusted towards tax liabilities.