2011 (8) TMI 1087 - SCH - Central Excise

Duty demand - Clandestine removal of goods - Assessee had indulged in the activity of manufacturing transporting depositing or in any other manner indulge in manufacturing and removing of excisable goods namely impregnated diamond scalves in contravention of provisions of rules and thereby rendered themselves liable for penal action under Rules 173Q(1) and 209A of the Central Excise Rules.

Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition in the case, as it did not find it suitable for exercising jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution. (Citation: 2011 (8) TMI 1087 - SC)