9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Challenge to Tribunal's judgment based on monetary limit for filing appeal by Revenue.
Summary: Issue 1: Whether Tribunal was right in not adjudicating Revenue's appeal due to tax effect below prescribed limit. The Revenue challenged Tribunal's dismissal of appeal based on CBDT's instructions on monetary limits for filing appeals. The Tribunal held that since the assessee had suffered a loss, the appeal was not maintainable. The notional tax effect was higher than the prescribed limit by the Board's circular. Issue 2: Whether Tribunal erred in not considering notional tax effect exceeding prescribed limit. In a related case, it was observed that previous circulars did not bar appeals based on negative income alone. The Board's circulars specified monetary limits for filing appeals based on tax effect, not on the assessee's income status. The Tribunal's dismissal of appeals solely due to negative income was deemed incorrect. Appeals should be considered based on notional tax effect exceeding prescribed limits. The judgment allowed the Tax Appeal, quashed the Tribunal's decision, and remanded the proceedings for consideration on merits, emphasizing the importance of notional tax effect in determining the maintainability of appeals.
|
