Home
Issues involved: Appeal against order of CIT(A) for assessment year 2004-05.
Facts: Search and seizure operation u/s. 132 of the I.T. Act, 1961 in group cases of M/s. Bhooratnam & Company. Incriminating documents found and seized. Case notified with ACIT, Central Circle-5, Hyderabad. Issue 1 - Interest u/s. 234B and 234C: - Assessing Officer levied interest u/s. 234B and u/s. 234C. - Assessee claimed TDS at Rs. 56,90,053, but only Rs. 29,09,173 credit given by AO. - Assessee argued for TDS benefit u/s. 199 as per Rule 37BA of I.T. Rules. - Counsel cited judgment of Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co. Ltd. v. CIT (1986) 160 ITR 961 (SC). - Counsel contended no shortfall in payment of prepaid taxes if full TDS credit given. - Mumbai ITAT decision in the case of Datamatics Ltd. (2008) 299 ITR (AT) 286 referred. - Counsel argued interest levied u/s. 234B without legal basis. Issue 2 - Interest u/s. 234C: - Assessee argued not liable for advance tax due to TDS exceeding tax payable. - Shortfall in prepaid tax calculated due to incomplete TDS credit. - Counsel requested deletion of interest levied u/s. 234C. - AO added interest u/s. 234B and u/s. 234C aggregating to Rs. 6,60,152. Judgment: - CIT(A) directed AO to give credit for TDS certificates filed by appellant company as per Rule 37BA. - Tribunal found no balance of tax payable by assessee after TDS credit. - Assessee not liable for interest u/s. 234B and 234C. - Revenue's appeal dismissed. Note: Separate judgment not delivered by the judges.
|