Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1996 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1996 (2) TMI 25 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Interpretation of partnership deed clause regarding continuation of firm in case of partner's death.
2. Entitlement to renewal of registration for an assessee-firm.
3. Validity of admission of deceased partner's widow into partnership.
4. Appeal against Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order.
5. Tribunal's decision based on Allahabad High Court case.
6. Supreme Court's overruling of Allahabad High Court decision.
7. Correct approach for registration post partner's death.

Analysis:
The case involves an application under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the entitlement of an assessee-firm to renewal of registration. The firm, constituted by a partnership deed, had a clause stating that in case of a partner's death, the firm would continue with the legal representative of the deceased partner. The Income-tax Officer initially denied registration renewal due to the admission of the deceased partner's widow into the partnership, considering it a change in the firm's constitution. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner ruled in favor of the assessee, leading to a Revenue appeal before the Tribunal.

The Tribunal's decision, relying on an Allahabad High Court case, was challenged. The High Court noted that the Supreme Court had overruled the Allahabad High Court decision in a different case, emphasizing that the death of a partner does not dissolve the firm but results in a change in the firm's constitution. The Supreme Court held that seeking registration, executing a new partnership deed, and applying for registration of that deed would be the appropriate course of action post a partner's death. However, this does not invalidate the registration up to the date of the partner's death.

In light of the Supreme Court's ruling, the High Court found the Tribunal's approach incorrect. The High Court concluded that the Tribunal's decision was not justified, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The judgment clarified the legal position regarding the continuation of a firm after a partner's death and the process for registration in such circumstances.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates