1966 (2) TMI 80 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:

1. Deduction of interest paid on borrowings under Section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act.
2. Classification of income and related expenses under different sections of the Income-tax Act.
3. Determination of the primary objective of borrowing funds by the assessee.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deduction of Interest Paid on Borrowings under Section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act:

The primary issue was whether the interest amount of Rs. 67,773 paid on borrowings by the assessee could be deducted from the dividend income under Section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal had allowed this deduction, reasoning that the dividends were earned from shares purchased using borrowed funds, and thus, the interest paid was necessary to earn the dividend income. However, the High Court disagreed, emphasizing that the expenditure must be incurred "solely for the purpose of making or earning such income." The Court concluded that the interest paid on the borrowings was not incurred solely for earning dividend income, but for the business of trading in shares and securities. Therefore, the interest could not be deducted under Section 12(2).

2. Classification of Income and Related Expenses under Different Sections of the Income-tax Act:

The Court analyzed the classification of income and expenses under different sections. The assessee had income from three sources: business, securities, and dividends. The Income-tax Officer allowed the interest deduction against business income under Section 10, not under Section 12(2). The Court supported this view, noting that the interest on borrowed capital used for business purposes falls under Section 10(2)(iii), which allows deduction of interest paid on capital borrowed for the business. The Court highlighted the legislative history, noting that income from dividends is computed under Section 12, while income from interest on securities is computed under Section 8. The Court emphasized that the purpose of the expenditure determines its classification.

3. Determination of the Primary Objective of Borrowing Funds by the Assessee:

The Court examined the primary objective behind the assessee's borrowing. The Income-tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner found that the borrowings were for the purpose of dealing in shares and securities, not for earning dividend income. The Court agreed, noting that the assessee's main business was trading in shares and securities, and the dividend income was incidental. The Court emphasized that the object of the borrowing was crucial in determining the admissibility of the deduction. Since the borrowings were for business purposes, the interest paid could not be considered an expenditure solely for earning dividend income.

Conclusion:

The High Court concluded that the interest of Rs. 67,773 paid on borrowings could not be deducted from the dividend income under Section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized that the expenditure must be incurred solely for earning the specific income, and in this case, the borrowings were for the business of trading in shares and securities. The Court answered the referred question in the negative and directed the assessee to pay the costs of the Commissioner.