9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Interpretation of tax law, imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The High Court of Delhi heard an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding a dispute over the classification of a gain from the sale of shares under an employees stock option plan. The appellant, a salaried employee, claimed a long term capital gain based on advice from a Chartered Accountant, but the Assessing Officer treated it as a short term capital gain. The issue of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was raised due to this discrepancy. The tribunal considered the facts presented, including the reliance on professional advice by the appellant and the absence of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The tribunal concluded that the appellant had made a bona fide claim for long term capital gain, and thus, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not warranted. The High Court agreed with the tribunal's reasoning, stating that the imposition of penalty was not justified in this case. Therefore, the High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the tribunal's decision that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not applicable in the circumstances.
|
