9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Appeal u/s 260A of Income-tax Act against Tribunal's order on assessment of income, substantial questions of law raised.
Issue I: Tribunal reduced net profit rate to 11% from 12%, assessee claimed 10%, past history of 8-10% accepted by department, Tribunal's decision not to be quoted as precedent. Issue II: Claim of depreciation under section 32 denied by Tribunal, legal deductions like depreciation allowable, assessee's claim not substantiated. Issue III: Tribunal's findings not considered perverse, assessment based on reasonable basis in absence of regular books of account, interference permissible only on grounds of perversity. Issue IV: Claim for deduction u/s 80-IB challenged, Tribunal's decision not influenced by irrelevant factors, no error in criteria applied. The assessee declared gross receipts and income for assessment year 2003-04, with net profit rate at 10%. Books of account produced were found inadequate, expenses details not provided due to managing partner's demise. Assessing Officer applied 12% net profit rate, upheld on appeal. Tribunal reduced rate to 11%, considering past acceptance of 8-10%. Assessee contended 10% rate was sufficient, but Tribunal's decision not deemed excessive. Claim for depreciation was denied by Tribunal, as tools and machinery ownership and business use not established. No substantial question of law arose regarding depreciation claim. Tribunal's findings not considered perverse, assessment based on reasonable basis in absence of regular books of account. Claim for deduction u/s 80-IB not influenced by irrelevant factors, no error in criteria applied. The appeal was dismissed.
|
