2015 (1) TMI 1202 - HC - Income Tax

Registration as a charitable trust under section 12A - Held that - The fact that the receipts from commercial activities are more compared to the overall receipts of the charitable organisation can neither lead to the conclusion that the activities of the trust or institution are not genuine nor can it be said that the activities of the trust or institution are not being carried out in accordance with the objects of the trust or institution and, therefore, the two conditions stipulated under the provisions of sub-section (3) of section 12AA of the Act, which empowers the authority to cancel the registration, do not exist in the present case. The registration granted is cancelled in view of the amendment of the first proviso to section 2(15) of the Act. That is not a ground specified in the statute for cancellation of the registration. In fact, sub-section (8) of section 13 of the Act which is introduced by Finance Act, 2012, which came into effect from April 1, 2009, categorically provides that, nothing contained in section 11 or section 12 shall operate so as to exclude any income from the total income of the previous year or any receipt thereof. If the provisions of the first proviso to clause (15) of section 2 becomes applicable in the case of such person in the said previous year, the statute has protected the interests of the Revenue. Notwithstanding the fact that the assessee is conferred registration under the provisions of section 12A of the Act, unless the assessee falls within the provisions of section 2(15) of the Act, excluding the first proviso, the assessee would not be entitled to the benefit of exemption from the tax. If the case of the assessee falls in the first proviso to section 2(15) of the Act, the benefit of registration which flow from section 12A of the Act is not available. Anyhow, that is a matter to be considered by the assessing authority. But on that ground, the registration cannot be cancelled, which is precisely the Tribunal has held by allowing the appeal in the present impugned order. - Decided in favour of assessee.

Issues:
1. Challenge to the cancellation of registration of a charitable trust under section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Interpretation of provisions related to cancellation of registration under section 12AA(3) of the Act.
3. Determination of whether commercial activities conducted by the trust affect its charitable status.
4. Consideration of whether the trust's activities align with the objects of general public utility.

Analysis:
1. The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the Tribunal's decision to set aside the Director of Income-tax's order cancelling the registration of the trust as a charitable entity under section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The trust, M/s. Karnataka Badminton Association (KBA), faced revocation of its registration due to financial discrepancies in its accounts for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10. The Director observed that the trust's activities resembled trade or business, leading to the cancellation of registration.

2. The Tribunal found that registration under section 12A could only be revoked if the trust's activities were not genuine or did not align with its stated objectives. It emphasized that commercial activities alone did not disqualify the trust from charitable status. The Tribunal's order was based on the premise that the trust's activities were in pursuit of general public utility, and cancellation could only occur if the trust deviated from its genuine objectives.

3. The key legal issue revolved around the impact of commercial activities on the trust's charitable status. The Revenue argued that post-amendment changes in the definition of "charitable institution" affected the trust's eligibility for registration under section 12A. The Revenue contended that the trust's activities, including renting facilities for events and exhibitions, exceeded the threshold for charitable purposes, leading to the cancellation of registration.

4. In contrast, the trust's counsel asserted that registration could only be denied under section 12AA(3) if the trust's activities were not genuine or did not align with its objectives. The trust maintained that despite engaging in commercial activities, the assessing authority should determine the extent of exemption rather than outright cancellation of registration. The Tribunal's decision was supported by the argument that the trust's activities, even if commercial, did not violate the conditions for registration under section 12A.

5. The High Court analyzed the provisions of section 12AA(3) and emphasized that cancellation of registration required findings of activities not being genuine or not aligning with the trust's objectives. The Court noted that the Director had not made such findings, and the mere dominance of commercial activities did not warrant cancellation. The Court highlighted that changes in the definition of "charitable purpose" did not provide grounds for cancellation unless the trust fell under section 2(15) of the Act.

6. Ultimately, the High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the Tribunal's decision. The Court concluded that the trust's registration could not be cancelled solely based on engaging in commercial activities, as long as the trust's genuine objectives were pursued. The Court ruled in favor of the trust, emphasizing that the assessing authority should determine the extent of exemption rather than cancelling registration based on commercial activities alone.

← Previous Next →