9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (1) TMI 1211 - AT - Income TaxAddition on account of unexplained cash deposit - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that - Assessing Officer has made addition on the basis AIR information. Though cash flow statement was furnished before him, but he has not looked into while making the addition; whereas the ld. CIT(A) has examined all the entries in the cash flow statement, which is available on record. In the cash flow statement, the movement of cash was disclosed and it is evident that on all dates whenever cash was deposited in the bank, the assessee was having sufficient cash balance. Nothing has been brought on record to demonstrate that the cash withdrawn by the assessee was exhausted or utilized for other purposes and the deposits were made out of undisclosed sources. In the light of these facts, we are of the considered opinion that the assessee has properly explained the source of deposits in the bank, which was properly appreciated by the ld. CIT(A). Accordingly, we find no infirmity in the order of the ld. CIT(A) and we confirm the same. - Decided against revenue.
Issues Involved:
1. Addition of unexplained cash deposit of Rs. 25.75 lakhs by Assessing Officer. 2. Deletion of the addition by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) based on cash flow statement. 3. Appeal by Revenue before the Tribunal challenging the deletion of addition. Analysis: Issue 1: Addition of unexplained cash deposit The Assessing Officer (A.O.) made an addition of Rs. 25.75 lakhs as unexplained income of the assessee based on cash deposits in Citi Bank and Standard Chartered Bank. The A.O. sought explanations from the assessee regarding the source of deposits, which the assessee attributed to personal savings, receipts, and withdrawals from the bank account. However, the A.O. was not convinced with the explanations provided by the assessee, leading to the addition of the said amount as unexplained income. Issue 2: Deletion of the addition by CIT(A) The assessee appealed before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) challenging the addition. The CIT(A) examined the cash flow statement submitted by the assessee in detail. The CIT(A) found that the cash flow statement adequately explained the sources of cash deposits in the bank accounts. The CIT(A) noted that the cash flow statement demonstrated that the assessee had sufficient cash balance at every point when deposits were made. Consequently, the CIT(A) deleted the addition of Rs. 25.75 lakhs, emphasizing that the assessee had discharged the onus to prove the source of the deposits. Issue 3: Appeal before the Tribunal The Revenue, aggrieved by the CIT(A)'s decision, filed an appeal before the Tribunal. The Revenue relied on the A.O.'s order, while the assessee's counsel reiterated the submission that the cash flow statement established the availability of sufficient cash balance at the time of deposits. The Tribunal carefully reviewed the orders of the lower authorities and observed that the A.O. had not considered the cash flow statement while making the addition. In contrast, the CIT(A) had thoroughly examined the cash flow statement and found it satisfactory. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A)'s assessment that the assessee had adequately explained the source of deposits, leading to the confirmation of the CIT(A)'s order and the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 25.75 lakhs, emphasizing that the cash flow statement provided by the assessee sufficiently demonstrated the legitimate sources of the cash deposits.
|
