Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2014 (10) TMI 849 - AT - Service TaxExtension of stay order beyond 365 days - matters the appeal could not be disposed of on account of heavy pendency and the delay in non-disposal is not attributable to the appellants. - Held that - The Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE Delhi 2014 (10) TMI 724 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB) has held that when the delay in disposing of appeal is not attributable to the appellants extension of stay can be granted. - Stay extended.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI granted extension of stay in various cases where appeal could not be disposed of due to heavy pendency, following the precedent set in M/s Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE, Delhi. All miscellaneous applications for extension of stay were allowed.
|