9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The issue in this case revolves around whether the levy of interest u/s 201 of the Income-tax Act is time-barred. Summary: The case involved a Government-owned company that entered into an agreement with a non-resident for a project. The company remitted an advance payment without deducting tax at source as required by law. The Income-tax Officer later ordered the company to pay tax and interest u/s 201(1A). The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld this order, and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal also confirmed it, relying on a previous court judgment. The Tribunal held that the order was time-barred u/s 231 of the Act. The High Court analyzed the provisions of sections 195, 200, and 201, emphasizing that the liability arises immediately upon failure to deduct tax at source or pay it, without the need for a demand. The court also discussed the operation of section 231 in relation to the time limit for recovery of tax and interest. The court considered the argument that interest liability is separate from tax liability but ultimately concluded that both tax and interest were time-barred in this case. The court agreed with the Tribunal's decision, stating that once the tax was time-barred, interest could not have a separate existence. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the levy of interest u/s 201 was indeed time-barred. The judgment was to be communicated to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for further action.
|
