9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Whether the amount received by the assessees towards consideration for retirement from the partnership firm amounts to transfer attracting capital gains.
In the judgment, the High Court of Kerala considered multiple appeals filed by the revenue challenging the Tribunal's decision that the amount received by the assessees for retirement from the partnership firm does not attract capital gains. The assessees were partners in a firm operating a bar attached hotel, and during their retirement, a significant amount was paid towards unaccounted consideration. The Assessing Officer treated this as a transfer attracting capital gains, but the Tribunal ruled otherwise, emphasizing that the retirement and reconstitution did not lead to the dissolution of the firm. The High Court referred to Supreme Court decisions which held that the retirement of a partner does not constitute a transfer under Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, and therefore, capital gains assessment is not applicable in such cases. The court dismissed the appeals filed by the revenue based on this legal interpretation. The High Court's decision in the above appeals also applied to Appeal Nos: 842/2009 & 1471/2009, where the respondent-assessees were partners in the same firm. Since the court had already ruled that no capital gains are assessable on retiring partners in the batch case, the same conclusion was extended to these appeals involving partners from the same firm. Consequently, the court dismissed these additional appeals filed by the revenue, maintaining consistency with its earlier findings.
|
