9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Whether a Single Member of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal could have heard and disposed of the appeal filed by the appellant under Section 129C(4) of the Customs Act, 1962. Analysis: The High Court considered the substantial question of law regarding the authority of a Single Member of the Tribunal to hear and dispose of the appeal. The Tribunal had imposed a redemption fine of Rs. 15 lakhs and a personal penalty of Rs. 8 lakhs on the appellant for the alleged violation of import rules. Section 129C(4) of the Customs Act was crucial in this case, which allows a single member to handle cases where the penalty involved does not exceed ten lakh rupees. However, in this instance, the redemption fine exceeded the limit, rendering it impermissible for a single member to preside over the appeal. The Court highlighted the specific provision in Section 129C(4)(c) which restricts the jurisdiction of a single member if the penalty amount surpasses Rs. 10 lakhs. As the redemption fine in this case amounted to Rs. 15 lakhs, the Court concluded that a single member of the Tribunal was not authorized to hear and decide the appeal. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the matter should be sent back to the Tribunal for a proper disposal on merits in compliance with the law. In light of the above findings, the Court directed that the bank guarantee provided by the appellant should remain in force until the Tribunal completes the appeal process. The judgment concluded by disposing of the appeal in accordance with the above decisions, highlighting the importance of adhering to the statutory provisions and ensuring a fair and lawful resolution of the case.
|
