9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (10) TMI 1095 - AT - Income TaxApplicability of higher rate of tax is decided against the assessee. Disallowance of expenditure on purchase of fixed assets is also decided against the assessee. Disallowance of bonus expense is decided in favour of the assessee. Disallowance of expenses incurred in relation to exempt income u/s 14A - Held that - In principle, we hold that the disallowance of interest is called for in the current year as well. As sufficient details in this regard are not available about the amount invested in tax free bonds and its co-relation with the borrowed funds, if any, we restore the matter to the file of A.O. for computing the disallowance u/s 14A on the interest component after verification of the necessary details after allowing a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Also disallowance at 2% of exempt income for management / administrative expenses is in order Deduction u/s 44C towards head office expenses attributable to Indian operations - Held that - Article 7(3) does not talk of limiting the deduction of expenses incurred for the business of the permanent establishment subject to the limitations contained in the Act. While discussing this issue for assessment year 1999-2000 in the context of section 43B, we have held that the restriction contained in specific sections cannot apply in the light of the language of Article 7(3) of the DTA. In that view of the matter, the restriction contained in section 44C for allowing the head office expenditure can also not apply. Resultantly the direction given by the learned CIT(A) to modify the adjusted total income as per section 44C becomes infructuous as section 44C itself cannot apply. This ground is allowed.
Issues:
1. Applicability of higher rate of tax 2. Disallowance of expenditure on purchase of fixed assets 3. Disallowance of bonus expenses 4. Disallowance of expenses incurred in relation to exempt income u/s 14A 5. Deduction u/s 44C towards head office expenses 6. Disallowance u/s 14A for various assessment years Analysis: Applicability of Higher Rate of Tax: - The first ground of the assessee's appeal regarding the higher rate of tax was decided against the assessee for the assessment year 2000-2001. - The same decision was upheld for subsequent assessment years, including 2001-2002, 2002-2003, 2003-2004, 2004-2005, 2005-2006, and 2006-2007. Disallowance of Expenditure on Purchase of Fixed Assets: - The disallowance of expenditure on the purchase of fixed assets was decided against the assessee for the assessment years 2000-2001, 2001-2002, 2002-2003, and 2003-2004. - This decision was consistent across these years. Disallowance of Bonus Expenses: - The third ground about the disallowance of bonus expenses was decided in favor of the assessee for the assessment years 2000-2001, 2001-2002, 2002-2003, and 2003-2004. - The decision remained consistent for these years. Disallowance of Expenses Incurred in Relation to Exempt Income u/s 14A: - The issue of disallowance of expenses incurred in relation to exempt income u/s 14A was extensively discussed for various assessment years. - The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to apply the decisions taken for the assessment year 2001-2002 for computing disallowance u/s 14A, both in respect of interest and administrative expenses, for the subsequent years. - The impugned orders were set aside to this extent for the assessment years 2001-2002, 2002-2003, 2003-2004, 2004-2005, 2005-2006, and 2006-2007. Deduction u/s 44C Towards Head Office Expenses: - The matter related to deduction u/s 44C towards head office expenses was discussed for the assessment year 2000-2001. - The Tribunal found that the restriction contained in section 44C for allowing head office expenditure could not apply as per Article 7(3) of the DTA. - The direction given by the CIT(A) to modify the adjusted total income as per section 44C was deemed infructuous, and the ground was allowed. This comprehensive analysis covers the key issues and decisions made by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT MUMBAI in the cited judgment.
|
